In my field of work, more and more people seem to be going ‘less than full time’. Nobody ever seems to regret it. So, why am I here working ‘full time’?
When you start to play with the idea of going less than full time with other people, there are both pros and cons discussed.
Some who are full time seem to look down on them, ‘jokingly’ calling them ‘slackers’, perhaps feeling they have to work more than them, but not realising it is an active choice they have made. Some say the money is important to them and their lifestyle. Some have dependents who need this to continue their current lifestyles too. Everyone’s financial situation is unique. Some say the training becomes unbearably long on top of an already long programme. Some say the experience you gain is less as a result. Some say seniors and rota coordinators don’t always support the decision due to staffing difficulties.
But the ones who are less than full time seem to be happy. They are less stressed. They have more time for their loved ones. They have more mental capacity to think. They never look back to full time work.
I think the terminology doesn’t help either. Unconsciously, I feel ‘less than’ if I go ‘less than full time’. I feel like I am 80% of a doctor rather than a ‘full’ doctor if I do 80% of the hours for 80% of the pay. Of course, this isn’t true. It’s a construct that is arbitrarily defined to be ‘full time’ or ‘100%’.
In an ideal world, my hours wouldn’t be so defined by someone else; there isn’t a ‘minimum’ number of hours to put in to pass some boundary somewhere. I understand experience is key, and learning through experience hands-on is irreplaceable. I love being a doctor, I love working and making a difference.
Currently, I don’t feel as though 100% of my time at work is loved, or is valuable to my learning, but a lot of it is. It would ultimately be a compromise for me to go ‘less than full time’, but I think it is a worthy one to make. For the sake of my loved ones, my time, my mental capacity and my value.